Some content below may have been reported by users for containing spoilers or offensive content. Learn More
Spoiler content is currently visible to you.
Offensive content is currently visible to you.
Why are the offensive comments posted in such a light print that you can hardly read the comment? I consider this an open forum for comments. It does not seem to be so if you do not agree with I guess the Democrats that post their opinions. That does not seem fair to the others that have a conflict in view of the book. Am I wrong and this is not an open forum?
I enjoyed the book immensely. It fleshed out alot of the things the news provides. I am perplexed by another comment from someone who is on the other end of the scale. Did this person actually read the book or just impose their opinion with bullet points from the conservative side? It takes courage and an open mind to be willing to read something by an author that's on the opposite side. One can sometimes learn new things by trying to understand both points of view. I have read books by authors on the conservative side and it offers insight into the subject. There is no truth--just perspective. We need to listen as well as speak.
DEFY THE COWARDLY FREE-SPEECH HATERS! TILT YOUR SCREEN SLIGHTLY TO READ THIS.
More Dem anti-2016 dis-information.
--- Before election day, Trump said the system was rigged. Obama knew this was true, as Obama had helped rig it. Hillary had paid the Russians for lies about Trump (Steele Dossier), and Obama had had the FBI use fake Steele info for warrants to spy on Trump's campaign. Obama feared Trump would find out and cry foul after Hillary had won. Obama therefore denied the election could be rigged, and dismissed Trump's concerns as nonsense: Trump was merely trying to explain away his coming loss. Dems denounced Trump for reserving the right to legally challenge the election result if fraud was evident: it was a threat to our country.
--- When Trump won, Dems reversed themselves. Now they said Russians had swung the election by exposing Hillary's corruption against Bernie, and by posting some fairly typical social media items. It was a silly bill of charges; Dems withheld the DNC server from FBI examination. Yet Trump-hating spymaster John Brennan was soon making Trump a Russian agent whom Putin had put in the White House. Brennan had once voted Communist; his CIA had spewed lies throughout the Cold War, assassinated foreign leaders, subverted governments, probably killed JFK, and endorsed Saddam's non-existent WMD. Yet Dems denounced all who doubted Brennan's word. They then sought to corrupt and intimidate the Electoral College. They incited violent, destructive riots, physically attacked Trump supporters, Republican officials and candidates, disrupted their meetings, kept them from speaking on campus, and screamed at Senators in the Capitol. They did far worse than what they had accused Trump of planning to do.
--- Candidate Hillary lied and failed in countless ways. No one else was responsible for her loss. She was burdened with scandals from the 1990s when she smeared Bill's female victims. She took huge payoffs for trade approvals as Secr of State. She alienated Liberals as well as Conservatives. She wanted open borders, condoned the Ferguson rioters, attacked straight White males, supported abortion, upheld gays over Christians and transgender restrooms over jobs. But she also supported Bush's lawless 2003 invasion of Iraq, cheated Bernie, and curried Goldman Sachs elitists. She repeatedly collapsed in public. She lost her own group, White women, by ten points. The Russians did not make all this happen. Even if they had a hand in revealing her wrongdoing in the primaries, which I doubt, it was still her wrongdoing, and voters were entitled to know what she had done.
--- The people who say Russians altered the 2016 vote would have denied it vehemently if Hillary had won. They would ridicule anyone who raised the issue.
The book neatly and comprehensively explains the broad reach of Russian interference with the 2016 election. Like many Americans, I suffer from fatigue regarding this story. However, this book reenergized this citizen's desire to have more information about collusion and honest answers from those who are now in power. I applaud the author's hard work in doing the extensive research necessary to compose such a book, and marvel at his writing ability to craft that research into a "page-turner." I think this is a book all Americans should read.
By one of the key reporters uncovering the web of links and lies that tie Trumpworld to Russia. A timely book that pulls all of threads together in timeline to make sense of Trump's America, where Truth goes to die.
The investigative team at WaPo brought down Tricky Dick, will they help bring down Don the Con?
Listen to Teri Gross' interview with the author on Fresh Air for more insight. For example, how Trump wanted reporters heads on pikes and wanted the FBI-DOJ to come up with a plan to imprison them.
There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.
There are no quotes for this title yet.